It’s time for anew way of thinking about secrecy. Secrecy is a form of government regulation. Americans are familiar with the tendency to over-regulate in other areas. What is different with secrecy is that the public cannot know the extent or the content of the regulation. Excessive secrecy has significant consequences for the national interest when, as a result, policy makers are not fully informed, government is not held accountable for its actions, and the public cannot engage on informed debate. This remains a dangerous world; some secrecy is vital to save lives, bring miscreants to justice, protect national security, and engage in effective diplomacy. Yet as Justice Potter Stewart noted in his opinion in the Pentagon Papers case, when everything is secret, nothing is secret. Even as billions of dollars are spent each year on government secrecy, the classification and personnel security systems have not always succeeded at their core task of protecting those secrets most critical to the national security. The classification system, for example, is used too often to deny the public an understanding of the policy making process, rather than for necessary protection of intelligence activities and other highly sensitive matters. The classification and personnel security systems are no longer trusted by many inside and outside the Government. It is now almost routine for American officials of unquestioned loyalty to reveal classified information as part on ongoing policy disputes—with one camp “leaking” information in support of a particular view, or to the detriment of another—or in support of settled administration policy. In the process, this degrades public service by giving a huge advantage to the least scrupulous players. Keywords: Secrecy, Report of the Commissionon, Protecting and Reduceing government secrecy, government regulations, debate, justice, natioanl security, dipomacy, Pentagon papers, Leaking Information,

Book Details